Mac Visser vs Nino Ehrenschneider Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 04 Sep at 02:03 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Visser vs N. Ehrenschneider

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Visser 1 - 0 Ehrenschneider
They have played 2 sets in total, with Mac Visser winning 2 and Nino Ehrenschneider winning 0. The last match between Mac Visser and Nino Ehrenschneider was at the M15 Haren, 04-09-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Mac Visser getting the victory 7-5 7-6(4).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Visser | 1 |
| Ehrenschneider | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Haren(09-04-25)
M. Visser vs N. Ehrenschneider H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 55.00% (22-18) | Career Total W/L | 67.95% (106-50) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Visser vs N. Ehrenschneider Match Preview:
- Visser's recent second serve points won stands at 41.61%, while Ehrenschneider has a slightly higher percentage at 45.04%. This statistic often helps predict match outcomes.
- When considering return game performance, Visser has won 47.88% of their opponent's second serve points, outperforming Ehrenschneider who achieved 42.94%.
- On first serve returns, Visser is again ahead, claiming 34.38% of points compared to Ehrenschneider's 29.23%, which is a key indicator for picking the favorite.
- Analyzing pressure scenarios, Ehrenschneider excels by saving 57.21% of breakpoints, surpassing Visser's 46.97%, which could be crucial in tight matches.
- Overall, Ehrenschneider has a dominant match win rate of 70.83% over the past year, while Visser's win rate is 55.56%.
- Clay is Visser's best surface with a 57% career win rate, but they struggle on hard courts with no wins recorded yet. Ehrenschneider's best performance is on indoor hard courts with a remarkable 76% win rate.
- Both players primarily compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, with Ehrenschneider capturing 70.97% of their matches compared to Visser’s 55.56%.
- Visser's opponents had an average ranking of 251.78, while Ehrenschneider faced less challenging competition with an average opponent rank of 319.74.
- Should this match reach a deciding set, Visser boasts a strong 71% success rate, significantly better than Ehrenschneider's 40%.
- Recent form shows Visser converting 39.76% of breakpoint opportunities, substantially higher than Ehrenschneider’s 27.7%, a crucial factor during pivotal match moments.
Editorial Prediction (September 4, 2025, UTC):
The matchup between Visser and Ehrenschneider presents an intriguing contest rooted in contrasting strengths.
Visser's superior return game and effectiveness in deciding sets position them well strategically, especially on surfaces that suit their style.
However, Ehrenschneider's overall higher winning percentage and resilience in saving breakpoints could potentially offset Visser's strengths.
Considering both players' performances and current trends, Ehrenschneider appears to have a slight edge, making them the likelier winner of this upcoming tennis match.
Mac Visser vs Nino Ehrenschneider Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Visser vs N. Ehrenschneider H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 14 | Games Won | 11 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:6:41 | Average Match Time | 2:6:41 |
| 56% (50/90) | 1st Serve % | 68% (52/77) |
| 62% (31/50) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (35/52) |
| 48% (19/40) | 2nd Serve Win % | 16% (4/25) |
| 71% (5/7) | Break Pts Won % | 31% (4/13) |
| 49% (38/77) | Return Points Win % | 44% (40/90) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Visser Recent Matches Played
N. Ehrenschneider Recent Matches Played

M. Visser vs N. Ehrenschneider Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.00% (22/18) | YTD Win/Loss | 67.95% (106/50) |
| 52.69% (49/44) | Sets Win/Loss | 66.38% (231/117) |
| 51.87% (486/451) | Games Win/Loss | 56.23% (1892/1473) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Hard Win/Loss | 67.68% (67/32) |
| 56.25% (18/14) | Clay Win/Loss | 66.67% (18/9) |
| 66.67% (2/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 70.00% (21/9) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.28 |
| 41 | Aces Total | 468 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 54 | Total Double Faults | 342 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:22:59 |
| 212.13 | Average Opponent Rank | 346.33 |
| 62% (932/1497) | 1st Serve % | 65% (5384/8273) |
| 60% (561/932) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (3807/5384) |
| 47% (267/565) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (1535/2889) |
| 47% (86/183) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (347/840) |
| 46% (671/1469) | Return Points Win % | 39% (3305/8369) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 37.50% (3/5) |
| 55.00% (22/18) | Futures W/L | 69.59% (103/45) |
| 55% (22/40) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 68% (104/154) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 33% (3/9) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (34/60) |
| 62% (8/13) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (16/36) |
| 90% (20/18) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (108/96) |
| 10% (20/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (108/12) |
| 20% (20/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (48/10) |